Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled to higher depreciation at 50% on machinery purchased under the Textiles Upgradation Fund Scheme and used for embroidery work in the textile industry.
Analysis: The higher depreciation claim was examined with reference to paragraph 6 of Part A-III of Appendix I to the Income-tax Rules, the Ministry of Textiles resolution governing TUFS, and the departmental circulars and certificates showing that fabric embroidery machines were treated as covered under the scheme. The Tribunal also relied on earlier coordinate bench decisions on identical facts, and held that in the absence of any contrary decision of the jurisdictional Bench or a higher court, judicial discipline required following those decisions. On the facts, the assessee's machinery was treated as falling within the TUFS-based depreciation entry.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to higher depreciation at 50%, and the Revenue's challenge failed.