<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (11) TMI 118 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14659</link>
    <description>Deduction under s. 80-I of the Income-tax Act turned on whether decorative printing/etching on plain glassware constitutes &quot;manufacture or production&quot; of an article or thing. Applying SC authority that &quot;manufacture&quot; is to be construed widely and includes processes such as printing, the HC held that manufacture involves transformation resulting in a new and different article with distinct character and use. Since the process irreversibly converted plain glassware into decorative glassware marketed as a different commodity, a distinct end-product emerged. The Tribunal&#039;s view was affirmed and the assessee was held entitled to s. 80-I relief; the question of law was answered in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2026 21:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=53659" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (11) TMI 118 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14659</link>
      <description>Deduction under s. 80-I of the Income-tax Act turned on whether decorative printing/etching on plain glassware constitutes &quot;manufacture or production&quot; of an article or thing. Applying SC authority that &quot;manufacture&quot; is to be construed widely and includes processes such as printing, the HC held that manufacture involves transformation resulting in a new and different article with distinct character and use. Since the process irreversibly converted plain glassware into decorative glassware marketed as a different commodity, a distinct end-product emerged. The Tribunal&#039;s view was affirmed and the assessee was held entitled to s. 80-I relief; the question of law was answered in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14659</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>