Commercially distinct product test applied to machining of castings, qualifying the activity as manufacture for tax deduction.

Machining raw castings through inspection, tooling, milling and related processes can amount to manufacture or production where the end product is commercially distinct from the input in name, character and use. Applying that test, raw castings were transformed into machined castings with a separate identity and use, so the activity was treated as manufacture or production. The undertaking therefore satisfied the statutory requirement for deduction under section 80-IC(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and the applicant was entitled to the deduction.

---

---

Issues: Whether the applicant's activity of machining raw castings into machined castings amounts to manufacture or production of an article or thing so as to qualify for deduction under section 80-IC(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

Analysis: The statutory condition under section 80-IC is that the undertaking must manufacture or produce an article or thing. Applying the settled test, the decisive question is whether the end product is commercially different from the raw material in name, character and use. On the facts stated, the raw castings undergo inspection, tooling, milling and other machine processes, after which a distinct product called machined casting emerges. The processed article is commercially different, has a separate identity and use, and cannot be treated as the same raw casting. The Authority therefore held that the applicant's proposed undertaking satisfies the manufacturing requirement of section 80-IC(2).

Conclusion: The activity qualifies as manufacture or production, and the applicant is entitled to deduction under section 80-IC(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

Ratio Decidendi: Where processing of raw material brings into existence a commercially distinct article with a different name, character and use, the activity constitutes manufacture or production for the purpose of deduction under section 80-IC.

---