Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to the benefit of the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, 1998 despite delay in payment of the amount required under the scheme.
Analysis: The amount payable under the scheme was not paid within the time prescribed. The scheme was treated as a self-contained scheme with no provision for condonation of delay. The benefit of the scheme could not be extended contrary to its terms, and the reasons offered for the delay were found insufficient even on the assumption that any discretion existed.
Conclusion: The petitioner was not entitled to the benefit of the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, 1998 because the delayed payment could not be condoned.