Excise duty on manufacture is not a sales tax, and a levy without direct trade restriction is not hit by Articles 301, 303 or 304.

An excise duty on manufacture or production does not become a sales or purchase tax merely because it is designed to replace such a tax. The levy on lubricants and chemicals used in blanket manufacture was treated as a valid excise impost within legislative competence, and its budgetary purpose could not alter its statutory character. The Court further held that the levy did not directly restrict the movement of goods or create prohibited interstate discrimination, so Articles 301, 303 and 304 were not infringed. The constitutional challenge therefore failed and the levy was upheld.

---

---

Issues: Whether the levy of purchase tax on lubricants and chemicals used in the manufacture of blankets was unconstitutional on the ground that the additional excise duty enacted in respect of woollen fabrics was in substance a sales or purchase tax, and whether the impugned levy offended Articles 301, 303 and 304 of the Constitution of India.

Analysis: The levy under the Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act, 1957 was held to be an excise duty attracted by manufacture or production, not a tax on sale or purchase. Its declared object or budgetary use could not alter the plain statutory language. The Court further held that Article 301 protects freedom of trade against direct restrictions on movement, and that Article 303 was inapplicable because the levy did not give preference to one State over another. Article 304 was also held not to be infringed, since the higher tax burden did not directly restrict the movement of goods or amount to a prohibited discrimination in interstate trade. The Court distinguished the Supreme Court authorities relied upon, holding that those cases involved direct restrictions on movement, unlike the present levy.

Conclusion: The challenge failed. The impugned levy was upheld and the petition was rejected.

Final Conclusion: The taxation measure was treated as a valid excise levy within legislative competence and not as a constitutionally impermissible restriction on inter-State trade.

Ratio Decidendi: An excise duty imposed on manufacture or production does not become a sales or purchase tax merely because it is intended to replace such a tax, and a levy that does not directly and immediately restrict the movement of trade is not hit by Articles 301, 303 or 304 of the Constitution.

---