Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :
        Central Excise

        1991 (7) TMI 103 - HC - Central Excise

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Court upholds constitutionality of excise duties, dismisses challenge. Petitioners ordered to pay full amounts. The court dismissed the writ petitions challenging the levy of additional duties of excise under the Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Court upholds constitutionality of excise duties, dismisses challenge. Petitioners ordered to pay full amounts.

                          The court dismissed the writ petitions challenging the levy of additional duties of excise under the Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act, 1957. It upheld the Act's constitutional validity, ruling that the duties fell within the scope of Article 272 of the Constitution as valid Union excise duties. The court criticized interim orders allowing reduced payments, ordering the encashment of bank guarantees and payment of interest to prevent revenue loss. Ultimately, the petitioners were directed to pay the full amounts owed, and the validity of the Act was affirmed.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Challenge to the levy of additional duties of excise.
                          2. Constitutional validity of the Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act, 1957.
                          3. Notifications issued under the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944.
                          4. Distribution of additional duties among States.
                          5. Doctrine of colourable legislation and legislative competence.
                          6. Interim orders and their impact on public revenue.

                          Summary:
                          1. Challenge to the Levy of Additional Duties of Excise:
                          The petitioners, job processors of cotton/man-made fabrics, challenged the levy of additional duties of excise u/s the Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act, 1957. They argued that this levy was ultra vires Article 366 (29A) read with Articles 246 and 274 of the Constitution, claiming it was in lieu of sales tax, a State subject under Entry 54 of List II.

                          2. Constitutional Validity of the Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act, 1957:
                          The respondents contended that the Act was relatable to Entries 84 and 97 of the Union List (List I) and had been upheld by the Supreme Court in M/s. Ujagar Prints v. Union of India. The court held that the additional duties of excise under the Act fell within the scope of Article 272 of the Constitution and were valid Union duties of excise.

                          3. Notifications Issued Under the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944:
                          The petitioners initially challenged notifications issued under the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, but later focused solely on the constitutional validity of the Additional Duties Act itself. The court noted that under Article 255, an Act of Parliament is not invalid solely because the President's recommendation was not obtained if the President later assented to the Act.

                          4. Distribution of Additional Duties Among States:
                          The court examined the distribution mechanism of additional duties among States as per the Second Schedule of the Act, noting that States levying sales tax on the commodities covered by the Act would not receive a share of the additional duties unless directed otherwise by the Central Government. This principle was found to be in accordance with Article 272 of the Constitution.

                          5. Doctrine of Colourable Legislation and Legislative Competence:
                          The petitioners argued that the Act was a colourable piece of legislation, essentially imposing a sales tax under the guise of excise duty. The court rejected this argument, stating that the Act's plain language clearly imposed a Union duty of excise, not a sales tax, and was within the legislative competence of Parliament under Entries 84 and 97 of the Union List.

                          6. Interim Orders and Their Impact on Public Revenue:
                          The court criticized the interim orders that allowed petitioners to pay only half the duty and furnish bank guarantees for the rest, resulting in significant revenue loss. The court ordered the encashment of bank guarantees and payment of interest at 17.5% per annum on the due amounts, emphasizing the need to restore public revenue and prevent petitioners from profiting at the public's expense.

                          Conclusion:
                          The writ petitions were dismissed with costs, and the court upheld the constitutional validity of the Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act, 1957, as a valid Union duty of excise. The interim orders were vacated, and the petitioners were ordered to pay the due amounts with interest.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found