Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessees, who manufactured carpets to order, were dealers liable to sales tax under the U.P. Sales Tax Act.
Analysis: The determining test was whether title to the carpets ever vested in the assessees and was transferred by them to the purchasers. On the facts found, the assessees merely manufactured carpets on commission and, in respect of the carpets covered by the reference, the title never vested in them at any stage. Where there was no vesting and transfer of title by the assessees, the transactions could not be treated as sales by them for sales tax purposes.
Conclusion: The assessees were not dealers in respect of the carpets manufactured to order and were not liable to sales tax on those transactions.