MRP manipulation in CVD assessment led to denial of stay and full pre-deposit of duty, interest and penalty.

Importers of spray paints who declared a lower RSP/MRP for CVD assessment under Section 4A of the Central Excise Act were found, on the record described, to face prima facie evidence of MRP manipulation. Price lists, statements of the proprietor, recovered stickers, sales invoices and panchnama material were treated as indicating repasting of stickers with a higher MRP after clearance and deliberate understatement of value to evade duty. On that basis, CESTAT held that interim relief was not justified and directed pre-deposit of the duty, interest and penalty within the stipulated time.

---

---

Issues: Whether the applicants had made out a prima facie case for stay and waiver of pre-deposit in a matter involving alleged misdeclaration and manipulation of MRP for assessment of CVD.

Analysis: The applicants imported spray paints and declared a lower RSP/MRP in the Bills of Entry for assessment of CVD under Section 4A of the Central Excise Act, 1944, but the record showed price lists for different periods, statements of the proprietor, recovered stickers, sales invoices and panchnama material indicating repasting of stickers with a higher MRP after clearance. The order treated this as prima facie evidence of manipulation of MRP and deliberate understatement of value with intent to evade duty. On that basis, the Customs authorities were held to have prima facie jurisdiction and the applicants were not found entitled to interim relief.

Conclusion: The applicants were directed to pre-deposit the entire duty, interest and penalty within the stipulated time, and stay was not granted.

---