Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellants were entitled to unconditional waiver of pre-deposit of duty and penalty in a case involving Cenvat credit taken on invoices found to be fake or fictitious.
Analysis: The credit had been disallowed on the basis that the invoices were subsequently found to be fake and the suppliers bogus. Under Rule 7(2) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, the credit availing assessee is required to ensure the genuineness of the supplier and to take reasonable steps to satisfy itself that the inputs are duty paid goods. The record also showed no credible attempt to establish the identity of the suppliers and no plea or proof of financial hardship was made to justify complete waiver.
Conclusion: The appellants were not entitled to full waiver of pre-deposit; they were directed to deposit 20% of the duty amount, with waiver of the balance duty and entire penalty subject to compliance.