CESTAT Mumbai: Proviso to Section 35B not Applicable in Commissioner's Orders Appeal The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai admitted the appeal as the proviso to Section 35B does not apply to orders passed by the Commissioner as an ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
CESTAT Mumbai: Proviso to Section 35B not Applicable in Commissioner's Orders Appeal
The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai admitted the appeal as the proviso to Section 35B does not apply to orders passed by the Commissioner as an adjudicating authority. The appeal was represented by Shri S. Patwari, CA for the Appellant and Dr. Y.D. Banga, SDR for the Respondent.
The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai admitted the appeal as the proviso to Section 35B does not apply to orders passed by the Commissioner as an adjudicating authority. The appeal was represented by Shri S. Patwari, CA for the Appellant and Dr. Y.D. Banga, SDR for the Respondent.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.