Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether duty on inputs cleared as such by a manufacturer was required to be determined under Rule 8 of the Central Excise Valuation (Determination of Price of Excisable Goods) Rules, 2000, or on the value shown in the incoming invoices in terms of the Board's circular relied upon by the assessee.
Analysis: The dispute turned on the valuation method applicable to inputs removed as such. The assessee relied on the Board's circular, which the appellate authority had accepted, and the record showed that duty had been discharged accordingly. In the absence of any reason to disregard the circular, the Revenue's attempt to insist on a different valuation basis under Rule 8 was not accepted.
Conclusion: The Revenue's challenge failed, and the valuation adopted by the assessee was upheld.
Final Conclusion: The appeal was rejected and the order in favour of the assessee was sustained.