Manufacture on transferred inputs and limitation objections supported prima facie waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery.

Processes such as deburring, boring, blackening, inspection and polishing on transferred inputs were treated on a prima facie basis as amounting to manufacture under Note 6 to Section XVI of the Central Excise Tariff Act, supporting Cenvat credit eligibility, especially where the goods were exported. A limitation objection was also accepted as a strong prima facie ground because the demand was alleged to be time-barred beyond the normal period and the relevant facts had been disclosed to the department. On these grounds, the assessee was considered to have made out a strong case for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery pending the appeal.

---

---

Issues: (i) whether the processes of deburring, boring, blackening, inspection and polishing on transferred inputs prima facie amounted to manufacture so as to support eligibility to Cenvat credit; (ii) whether the plea of limitation raised a strong prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit.

Issue (i): Whether the processes of deburring, boring, blackening, inspection and polishing on transferred inputs prima facie amounted to manufacture so as to support eligibility to Cenvat credit.

Analysis: The processes carried out on the inputs were considered in the light of Note 6 to Section XVI of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. On a prima facie view, those operations were treated as amounting to manufacture. The goods were also exported, which supported the assessee's claim to Cenvat credit in the circumstances.

Conclusion: The issue was found in favour of the assessee.

Issue (ii): Whether the plea of limitation raised a strong prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit.

Analysis: The demand was also assailed as time-barred on the ground that the show cause notice was issued beyond the normal period and that the material facts had been disclosed to the department. This limitation objection was accepted as a well-taken prima facie ground, and the Revenue did not specifically counter it.

Conclusion: The issue was found in favour of the assessee.

Final Conclusion: The assessee made out a strong prima facie case for interim relief, warranting waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery pending disposal of the appeal.

Ratio Decidendi: Where the processes on inputs prima facie amount to manufacture and a substantial limitation objection is raised, the assessee may be entitled to waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery at the interim stage.

---