Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the discount allowed to licensed stamp vendors under the Gujarat Stamps Supply and Sales Rules, 1987 is commission or brokerage within section 194H of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The applicable rules showed that licensed vendors purchased stamp papers from the Government on payment of price less discount, maintained prescribed accounts, and operated under regulatory restrictions. Those restrictions did not, by themselves, create an agency relationship. The decisive features were that title passed to the vendor on purchase, the vendor was not merely remitting sale proceeds to the Government, and the discount was an allowance on purchase rather than remuneration for services rendered on behalf of the Government. The definition in section 194H, even though wide, still required a payment to a person acting on behalf of another person, so the element of agency remained essential. The court therefore treated the dealings as sales on principal to principal basis and not as an agency arrangement.
Conclusion: The discount allowed to licensed stamp vendors was not commission or brokerage within section 194H, and the impugned communications directing tax deduction at source were unsustainable.
Ratio Decidendi: A discount arising from a sale on principal to principal basis is not commission or brokerage under section 194H unless the recipient is acting on behalf of another person in an agency relationship.