Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>High Court allows partner rebates as deductible expenses under commercial expediency, ruling in favor of assessee firm.</h1> <h3>HARIHAR COTTON PRESSING FACTORY Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, BOMBAY NORTH</h3> The High Court held that the rebates granted to the partners were admissible deductions under section 10(2)(xv) and were not affected by section 10(4)(b). ... - Issues Involved:1. Whether the sum of Rs. 9,689/Rs. 40,388 representing rebate granted to four out of five partners of the assessee firm is an admissible deduction in computing the profits for the assessment year 1953-54/1954-55 having regard to the provisions of section 10(2)(xv) read with section 10(4)(b) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922.2. Whether the amount of Rs. 9,689/Rs. 40,388 can at all fall under section 10(2)(xv) particularly because it is paid out of income already earned and is not paid in order to earn it.Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:1. Admissibility of Deductions under Section 10(2)(xv) Read with Section 10(4)(b)The Tribunal had to consider whether the rebates granted to four out of five partners were admissible deductions under section 10(2)(xv) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, which allows for any expenditure laid out or expended wholly and exclusively for the purpose of such business. However, section 10(4)(b) prohibits any allowance in respect of any payment by way of interest, salary, commission, or remuneration made by a firm to any partner of the firm.The Tribunal found that the rebates were amounts given to partners by way of reduction in pressing charges. The Tribunal rejected the Department's argument that these amounts were merely appropriations of income after it had been earned. The Tribunal also determined that the rebates were granted on grounds of commercial expediency, a finding that was not contested by the Revenue.The High Court agreed with the Tribunal's conclusion that the rebates were not appropriations of income but rather fell under the heading of 'commercial expediency,' making them admissible deductions under section 10(2)(xv). The Court also concluded that these rebates did not constitute 'commission' within the meaning of section 10(4)(b). The term 'commission' is understood as an allowance for services rendered, often calculated as a percentage on price or value. In contrast, a rebate is a remission or payment back and is of the nature of a deduction from the gross amount.The Court held that the rebates were genuine and bona fide, and as such, they were not hit by the prohibition imposed by section 10(4)(b). Therefore, the rebates were admissible deductions in computing the profits of the assessee firm.2. Rebate as Income Already EarnedThe second issue involved whether the rebates could be considered as payments made out of income already earned and thus not falling under section 10(2)(xv). The Tribunal had initially found that the rebates were not appropriations of income but were given on the grounds of commercial expediency.The High Court noted that the Tribunal had relied on its own experience and found that it was a normal practice to give such rebates. The Court emphasized that it would be beyond its advisory jurisdiction to sit in appeal over the Tribunal's finding of fact regarding the general practice of giving rebates.The Court concluded that the rebates were given as a matter of commercial expediency and were thus allowable expenses under section 10(2)(xv). The rebates were not considered as payments made out of income already earned but were part of the business expenses necessary for maintaining business relations and securing future business.Conclusion:The High Court held that the rebates granted to the partners were admissible deductions under section 10(2)(xv) and were not hit by the provisions of section 10(4)(b). The amounts of Rs. 9,689 and Rs. 40,388 were considered as rebates given on grounds of commercial expediency and not as appropriations of income already earned. The reference was answered in favor of the assessee firm, and the Commissioner was directed to pay the costs of the assessee firm.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found