TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>High Court upholds Tribunal decision on tax appeal; rules no principal-agent relationship, no tax implications on commission payments</h1> <h3>PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RAJKOT-1 Versus MANISHABEN N MASHRU</h3> PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RAJKOT-1 Versus MANISHABEN N MASHRU - TMI Issues:1. Disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for non-deduction of tax at source on commission paid by the assessee.Analysis:The case involved an appeal by the Revenue against the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal's judgment regarding the disallowance made under Section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Assessing Officer had added &8377; 82.63 lakhs to the assessee's income for non-deduction of tax at source on commissions paid. The assessee, engaged in air ticketing, had paid commissions to agents without deducting tax at source. The Assessing Officer contended that tax should have been deducted on the commission payments. The CIT(A) upheld the addition, leading the assessee to appeal before the Tribunal.The Tribunal, relying on the judgment in the case of Ahmedabad Stamp Vendors' Association v. Union of India, held that there was no principal-agent relationship between the assessee and the travel agents to whom the commissions were paid. The assessee, a member of the International Air Transport Association, explained that the travel agents were consumers who booked tickets at a concessional rate through her membership, not agents working on her behalf. She argued that the discounted rates were not commissions but trade discounts offered to the agents. The Tribunal accepted this explanation, emphasizing the necessity of a principal-agent relationship for tax implications under Section 194H of the Act.The High Court, concurring with the Tribunal's view, dismissed the Tax Appeal, stating that no question of law arose. The judgment highlighted the importance of establishing a principal-agent relationship for tax implications on commission payments. The decision emphasized the specific facts of the case and the nature of the relationship between the assessee and the travel agents in determining the tax treatment of the commission payments.
TaxTMI 