Strict construction of fertiliser exemption and non-deductibility of selling-agent commission from excise assessable value.

An exemption notification for mixed fertilisers was construed strictly: relief applied only to mixtures made from two or more fertilisers on which duty had already been paid, and not to products manufactured with additional inputs such as acids or gases. On that basis, the product did not qualify for exemption. Commission paid to selling agents under an agency arrangement was treated as remuneration for services in securing and executing orders, not as a discount allowed to buyers at removal; it was therefore not deductible as trade discount in assessing excise value. The challenge to the excise assessments failed on both issues.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the fertiliser manufactured by the appellant was entitled to exemption under Notification No. 25/70 dated 1-3-1970 as a mixed fertiliser; (ii) Whether commission paid to selling agents was deductible as trade discount in computing the assessable value for excise duty.

Issue (i): Whether the fertiliser manufactured by the appellant was entitled to exemption under Notification No. 25/70 dated 1-3-1970 as a mixed fertiliser.

Analysis: The notification exempted only mixed fertilisers manufactured from two or more fertilisers on which duty had already been paid. The Explanation, read with the notification as a whole, showed that the exemption was confined to mixtures of fertilisers and not to products formed by using fertilisers along with other commodities such as acids and gases. The manufacture of the appellant's product involved the use of sulphuric acid and ammonia in addition to fertilisers, so the product did not satisfy the notification.

Conclusion: The appellant was not entitled to exemption under the notification.

Issue (ii): Whether commission paid to selling agents was deductible as trade discount in computing the assessable value for excise duty.

Analysis: The agreements showed that the selling agents were appointed to secure and execute orders and to act on behalf of the appellant for sale and distribution of the product. The commission was remuneration for services rendered under an agency arrangement, not a discount allowed to a buyer at the time of removal of goods. It therefore did not fall within trade discount for purposes of deduction in assessable value.

Conclusion: The commission was not deductible as trade discount.

Final Conclusion: The appellant failed on both issues, and the challenge to the excise assessments did not succeed.

Ratio Decidendi: An exemption notification must be construed according to its terms and, where it confines relief to mixed fertilisers manufactured from paid-duty fertilisers, the benefit is unavailable to a product made with additional non-fertiliser inputs; commission paid to selling agents under an agency contract is not trade discount deductible from assessable value.

---