Related-party import valuation: declared value rejected and commercial level adjustment upheld for distributor-level imports

Declared import value may be rejected where the importer and foreign supplier are related and the pricing arrangement is not shown to be an arm's length commercial sale. In such a case, the assessable value can be determined by comparison with prices charged to unrelated buyers under the Customs Valuation Rules, 1988, with an appropriate commercial level adjustment. The 5% adjustment was upheld because the unrelated sales were at actual user level, while the importer operated at distributor level, and the comparative discounts did not justify acceptance of the declared transaction value.

---

---

Issues: Whether the declared import value could be rejected and the assessable value determined by comparison with prices charged to unrelated buyers after allowing a 5% adjustment for commercial level difference, in view of the relationship between the importer and the foreign supplier under the Customs Valuation Rules, 1988.

Analysis: The importer was a 100% subsidiary and exclusive agent of the foreign supplier, and the pricing arrangement differed from ordinary commercial sales to independent buyers. The price offered to the related buyer was found not to represent a normal arm's length transaction, and the declared value was therefore not acceptable under the valuation rule governing related-party transactions. The adjustment of 5% for commercial level difference was upheld because imports by independent buyers were at actual user level, whereas the importer acted at distributor level and the comparative discounts in unrelated sales did not justify acceptance of the declared value.

Conclusion: The declared value was rightly rejected, and the enhancement with 5% commercial level adjustment was sustained in favour of Revenue.

Ratio Decidendi: Where importer and supplier are related and the pricing arrangement is not shown to be an arm's length commercial sale, the declared transaction value may be rejected and the assessable value determined with appropriate commercial level adjustment.

---