Prepaid distributor margin treated as commission under TDS rules where the arrangement was held to be principal-agent.

The Tribunal treated the prepaid distributor margin as commission because the arrangement was characterised as a principal-agent relationship, not a principal-to-principal sale. Applying the jurisdictional High Court's ruling on the same distribution model, it held that the discount or margin allowed to distributors fell within section 194H and remained subject to tax deduction at source even without an actual cash outflow. On that basis, the assessee was held liable under sections 201(1) and 201(1A) for failure to deduct tax.

---

---

Issues: Whether the margin retained by prepaid distributors amounted to commission or brokerage liable to tax deduction at source under section 194H of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and whether the distributor arrangement was a principal-to-principal sale or a principal-agent relationship.

Analysis: The dispute turned on the true character of the arrangement between the assessee and its distributors. The Tribunal held that the issue was governed by the jurisdictional High Court decision which had examined the same prepaid distribution model and concluded that the relationship was one of principal and agent. On that basis, the discount or margin allowed to the distributor was treated as commission within the meaning of section 194H. The Tribunal also noted that the absence of an actual cash outflow did not take the margin outside the scope of tax deduction at source, and that the arrangement created an agency relationship rather than a contract of sale under the Sale of Goods Act and the Indian Contract Act framework.

Conclusion: The margin retained by the distributors was commission liable to deduction of tax at source under section 194H, and the assessee was liable under sections 201(1) and 201(1A).

---