Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Tribunal should quash a show cause notice proposing recovery of refund already sanctioned and paid pursuant to its earlier order.
Analysis: The refund had already been granted in pursuance of the Tribunal's earlier order, and the impugned notice proposed recovery of the allegedly erroneous refund. The Tribunal held that the notice had been issued under Section 11A and that, at the stage of show cause notice, it should not interfere with a matter that was yet to be adjudicated by the original authority. The applicant was left free to place all submissions before the adjudicating authority, and no opinion was expressed on the merits of the notice.
Conclusion: The request to quash the show cause notice was rejected.
Final Conclusion: The proceeding was disposed of by declining interference at the show cause notice stage and leaving the merits to the adjudicating authority.
Ratio Decidendi: A writ or tribunal challenge to a show cause notice is ordinarily not entertained where the notice is still pending adjudication and no final finding on merits has yet been recorded.