Revenue's Stay Petition Rejected: Buyers Eligible for Refund under Section 11B The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi rejected Revenue's application for staying the operation of the impugned order of Commissioner (Appeals) as the ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Revenue's Stay Petition Rejected: Buyers Eligible for Refund under Section 11B
The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi rejected Revenue's application for staying the operation of the impugned order of Commissioner (Appeals) as the respondent had produced the requisite certificate for exemption under Notification No. 108/95-C.E. Buyers can claim refund as per Section 11B, stepping into the shoes of the manufacturer. Therefore, the Revenue's stay petition was rejected.
The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi rejected Revenue's application for staying the operation of the impugned order of Commissioner (Appeals) as the respondent had produced the requisite certificate for exemption under Notification No. 108/95-C.E. The Tribunal noted that buyers can claim refund as per Section 11B, stepping into the shoes of the manufacturer. Therefore, the Revenue's stay petition was rejected.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.