Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery of duty and penalty on the strength of the exemption notification.
Analysis: The demand arose from denial of the exemption available under Notification No. 6/2002 for equipment and machinery procured for use in the Delhi MRTS project. The disputed steel plates were shown to be used as part of traction equipment, and the material placed before the Tribunal indicated that such items fell within the scope of the exemption. On that basis, the appellant established a strong prima facie case for interim relief.
Conclusion: The requirement of pre-deposit of the entire duty and penalty was waived and the stay petition was allowed in favour of the assessee.