Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the product in question was classifiable as computer software under Sub-heading 8524.20 of Heading 85.24 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 or as other computer software under Sub-heading 8524.90.
Analysis: Heading 85.24 covers records, tapes and other recorded media for sound or other similarly recorded phenomena, and specifically includes computer software as well as magnetic tapes and magnetic discs. The classification dispute turned on whether the software was to be treated as operational software or application software, but the tariff heading itself did not provide any further classification on that basis. The software was used with a data processing machine for checking and verifying the operation of a telecommunication satellite, which supported classification under the computer software entry.
Conclusion: The software was correctly classifiable under Sub-heading 8524.20, and the Revenue's contention for classification under Sub-heading 8524.90 was rejected.
Final Conclusion: The appeal failed and the classification adopted by the Commissioner (Appeals) was upheld.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the tariff entry specifically covers computer software and no separate tariff distinction exists between operational and application software, the software must be classified according to the appropriate computer software sub-heading and not under the residual entry.