Tribunal allows appeal delay due to missing order copy; justifies beyond control, directs stay listing. The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai condoned an eight-month delay in filing an appeal due to the non-receipt of the order copy by the assessee's ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Tribunal allows appeal delay due to missing order copy; justifies beyond control, directs stay listing.
The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai condoned an eight-month delay in filing an appeal due to the non-receipt of the order copy by the assessee's representative, who had left the services. The delay was deemed justified as it was beyond the assessee's control. The Tribunal directed the listing of the stay application.
The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai heard an appeal with an eight-month delay in filing. The delay was due to the order copy not being received by the employee representing the assessee, who left the services. The delay was satisfactorily explained and condoned as circumstances were beyond the assessee's control. Stay application to be listed.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.