Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2009 (3) TMI 651 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal orders reassessment to determine nature of contract in tax case The Tribunal restored the case to the Assessing Officer to ascertain the true nature of the contract between the assessee and suppliers regarding the ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Tribunal orders reassessment to determine nature of contract in tax case

                            The Tribunal restored the case to the Assessing Officer to ascertain the true nature of the contract between the assessee and suppliers regarding the supply of goods. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of examining the contract terms, specifications, and circumstances of supply to determine whether the transactions constituted works contracts or sales contracts. The Assessing Officer was directed to establish the correct legal provisions based on the actual nature of the transactions. All appeals were allowed for statistical purposes, and the CIT(A)'s findings were overturned.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Applicability of Section 194C of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
                            2. Nature of the contract between the assessee and suppliers.
                            3. Determination of whether the transactions were contracts for sale or works contracts.
                            4. Liability of the assessee under Section 201(1) and interest under Section 201(1A) of the Act.

                            Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Applicability of Section 194C of the Income-tax Act, 1961
                            The primary issue in this case was whether the provisions of Section 194C, which mandates the deduction of tax at source (TDS) on payments made to contractors for carrying out any work, were applicable to the payments made by the assessee-company for the supply of glass bottles, plastic crates, and other packing materials. The assessee argued that these payments were for the purchase of goods and not for works contracts, thus falling outside the purview of Section 194C. The Income-tax Officer (ITO) contended that since the goods were supplied as per specific designs and logos, the transactions constituted works contracts.

                            2. Nature of the Contract Between the Assessee and Suppliers
                            The assessee claimed that the goods were purchased under a contract of sale, issuing purchase orders, and receiving invoices with applicable taxes. The ITO, however, argued that the nature of the transactions indicated a works contract because the goods were manufactured to specific requirements and could not be sold to others if not accepted by the assessee. The ITO emphasized the importance of the specifications and the inability of suppliers to use or sell the items independently.

                            3. Determination of Whether the Transactions Were Contracts for Sale or Works Contracts
                            The Tribunal examined various judicial pronouncements and CBDT circulars to determine the nature of the contracts. It was noted that the distinction between a contract for sale and a works contract depends on whether the primary objective is the transfer of property in goods or the execution of work and labor. The Tribunal referred to the Supreme Court's decision in Associated Hotels of India Ltd., which stated that the primary objective and the intention of the parties must be considered. The Tribunal also cited the Supreme Court's decision in Anandam Viswanathan, which emphasized understanding the nature of the transaction and the intention of the parties.

                            4. Liability of the Assessee Under Section 201(1) and Interest Under Section 201(1A) of the Act
                            The ITO held the assessee liable under Section 201(1) for not deducting TDS and computed the total liability along with interest under Section 201(1A). The CIT(A) had accepted the assessee's plea and directed the deletion of the tax charged and interest. However, the Tribunal found that the true nature of the contract was not clearly established and required further examination.

                            Conclusion:
                            The Tribunal restored the matter to the file of the Assessing Officer to determine the true nature of the contract between the assessee and the suppliers. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to examine the terms and conditions of the contract, the specifications provided by the assessee, and the circumstances under which the goods were supplied. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of understanding the true nature of the transactions to apply the correct legal provisions. All appeals were allowed for statistical purposes, and the findings of the CIT(A) were set aside.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found