Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the supply of specially designed printed receipt books to the Electricity Board was a sale of goods liable to sales tax or a works contract outside the charging provision.
Analysis: The decisive test was the nature of the transaction and the intention of the parties. The printed books were specially prepared to the customer's specifications, had no general commercial use, were not marketable to others, and were supplied under a composite charge for job-work. Although paper and ink passed to the customer in the course of execution, such passing of property was only incidental to the printing work and not a transfer of a chattel as such. The authority applied the settled distinction between a contract for sale and a contract for work and labour, holding that where the finished product has no independent marketability and the dominant object is specialised work, the transaction is not a sale.
Conclusion: The supply was a works contract and not a sale of goods, so it was not liable to sales tax.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the dominant object of the transaction is specialised work done to the customer's specifications and the transfer of materials is merely incidental, the contract is one of work and labour, not a sale of goods.