Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the supply of building materials by the contractee to the building contractor for use in construction work amounted to a sale liable to sales tax.
Analysis: The decisive factor was the terms of the contract governing supply and use of materials. On the wording of the agreement, the materials supplied became the contractor's property on supply and the value of such materials was chargeable to the contractor. The arrangement was not confined to a mere custody or trust for use by the contractor, nor was it a case where the contractee retained ownership throughout. The principle applied was that, even where the parties do not intend a conventional sale, a sale may nevertheless be embedded in the transaction if property in the goods passes to the contractor on supply for use in the work.
Conclusion: The supply of building materials constituted a sale and was liable to tax under the U.P. Sales Tax Act.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the contract provides that materials supplied by the contractee become the contractor's property and their value is recoverable from the contractor, the transaction amounts to a sale and not a mere supply for works.