Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2003 (4) TMI 266 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Printed Packing Material Supply: Works Contract, TDS Deduction Upheld The Tribunal held that the supply of printed packing material constituted a works contract under Section 194C of the IT Act, requiring TDS deduction. The ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Printed Packing Material Supply: Works Contract, TDS Deduction Upheld

                          The Tribunal held that the supply of printed packing material constituted a works contract under Section 194C of the IT Act, requiring TDS deduction. The Tribunal overturned the CIT(A)'s decision, reinstating the AO's demand under Section 201(1) for short deduction and interest under Section 201(1A). The Tribunal emphasized the specialized nature of the printed material and its composite charges, aligning with the Bombay High Court's precedent. Consequently, the Revenue's appeal was successful, affirming the demand and interest imposed on the assessee.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Applicability of Section 194C of the IT Act to the supply of printed packing material.
                          2. Justification of the demand under Section 201(1) and interest under Section 201(1A) of the IT Act.

                          Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Applicability of Section 194C of the IT Act to the Supply of Printed Packing Material:

                          The primary issue in this case is whether the supply of printed packing material (PP woven sacks) by the assessee falls under a works contract as per Section 194C of the IT Act, necessitating the deduction of TDS. The Assessing Officer (AO) argued that the supply of printed packing material is a works contract because the material is printed with the assessee-company's trade name, logo, contents, and quantity as per its specifications. This specialized skill and the inability to use the printed material in the open market without the prescribed specifications support the AO's view. The AO referred to Circular No. 715 dated 8th August 1995, issued by the CBDT, which supports the interpretation that such transactions are works contracts.

                          The CIT(A) disagreed, stating that the transaction was purely a purchase and sale, not requiring TDS under Section 194C. The CIT(A) relied on the Tribunal's decision in the Wadilal Dairy International Ltd. case, which concluded that similar transactions were purchases, not works contracts.

                          However, the Tribunal found that the facts of the case are more aligned with the decision of the Bombay High Court in Sarvodaya Printing Press vs. State of Maharashtra, where the supply of specially printed material was deemed a works contract. The Tribunal emphasized that the printed material, having no market value without the specific specifications, and the composite nature of the charges, indicate that the transaction is a works contract. The Tribunal also highlighted the importance of the intention of the contracting parties and the specific printing requirements, which are not incidental but crucial to the transaction.

                          2. Justification of the Demand under Section 201(1) and Interest under Section 201(1A) of the IT Act:

                          The AO's creation of a demand for short deduction of Rs. 92,994 under Section 201(1) and interest of Rs. 10,808 under Section 201(1A) was based on the view that the assessee failed to deduct TDS on the payments for the printed packing material. The CIT(A) had canceled this demand, considering the transaction as a purchase.

                          The Tribunal, however, reversed the CIT(A)'s decision, upholding the AO's action. The Tribunal reiterated that the transaction is a works contract, and therefore, the assessee was required to deduct TDS under Section 194C. The Tribunal noted that the CIT(A) failed to consider the binding precedent set by the Bombay High Court in Sarvodaya Printing Press and other relevant judicial pronouncements, which clearly classify such transactions as works contracts. Consequently, the Tribunal found the AO's creation of the demand and the charging of interest to be legally correct and justified.

                          Conclusion:

                          The Tribunal concluded that the supply of printed packing material by the assessee is a works contract under Section 194C of the IT Act. Therefore, the assessee was required to deduct TDS on the payments made for such material. The Tribunal reversed the CIT(A)'s order and restored the AO's order, upholding the demand under Section 201(1) and the interest under Section 201(1A). The appeal of the Revenue was accepted.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found