Revenue appeal dismissed for 96-day filing delay by CESTAT Mumbai, lack of genuine reason, stay application rejected. The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai dismissed the Revenue's appeal due to a 96-day delay in filing, rejecting their condonation of delay application for ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Revenue appeal dismissed for 96-day filing delay by CESTAT Mumbai, lack of genuine reason, stay application rejected.
The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai dismissed the Revenue's appeal due to a 96-day delay in filing, rejecting their condonation of delay application for lack of genuine reason. The Tribunal also dismissed the stay application.
The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai rejected the condonation of delay application filed by the Revenue for a 96-day delay in filing the appeal. The Tribunal found no genuine reason for the delay and dismissed both the stay application and the appeal.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.