Penalty for technical breach fails where no mens rea or contumacious conduct is shown.

Penalty cannot be sustained for a mere technical or procedural breach where the order records no finding of mens rea, deliberate default, or contumacious conduct. In the absence of any attribution of culpability to the assessee in the show cause notice proceedings, the penal consequence was held unwarranted. The applied principle is that a technical breach alone does not justify penalty unless the record shows intentional or contumacious non-compliance.

---

---

Issues: Whether penalty could be sustained for a mere technical or procedural breach in the absence of any finding of mens rea or contumacious conduct.

Analysis: The order did not record any finding imputing the appellant to the charges in the show cause notice, nor did it disclose any contumacious conduct. In the absence of mens rea, penal consequence was held to be unwarranted. The principle applied was that a mere technical breach, without deliberate default, does not justify imposition of penalty.

Conclusion: Penalty was not sustainable and the appeal was allowed in favour of the assessee.

---