Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the order withdrawing investment allowance under sections 154 and 155(4A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 could be sustained when the assessee was given only one day to respond to the show-cause notice.
Analysis: The challenge turned on the adequacy of the opportunity afforded before the rectification order was passed. The notice period was found to be too short for an effective reply, and even the Department fairly accepted that such a short time could not permit a proper response. The order was therefore liable to be interfered with on the ground of denial of proper hearing.
Conclusion: The withdrawal of investment allowance could not be sustained and was quashed. The matter was directed to be reconsidered by the concerned authority after giving the assessee proper opportunity of hearing.