Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Kolkata rejected the Revenue's appeal, confirming duty demand but setting aside penalty and interest. The Tribunal deemed the authorization for the appeal invalid and found no grounds for interference with the impugned order.
The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Kolkata heard an appeal where duty demand was confirmed but penalty and interest were set aside. The Tribunal found the authorization for the appeal invalid and rejected the Revenue's appeal, stating that the impugned order did not call for any interference.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.