Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the import of heavy melting scrap was covered by the required pre-shipment inspection certificate from an authorised agency, and whether the later DGFT clarification dated 18-2-2005 could be applied to deny the benefit.
Analysis: The importer had produced inspection certificates issued through Bureau Veritas, including the Mumbai office, which was a notified and authorised agency. The requirement under the relevant DGFT public notice was treated as satisfied once an authorised agency certificate was available. The subsequent clarification could not govern the transaction because the inspection and import had taken place before that clarification was issued, and the consignment had already landed in India by then.
Conclusion: The confiscation and penalty were not sustainable. The finding that the import was not covered by the specified inspection certificate was set aside in favour of the assessee.