Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the customs authorities were justified in rejecting the declared transaction value of the imported goods and enhancing assessable value by relying on a foreign market price.
Analysis: The declared price was for supply at the port of import. The enhancement was based on a ledger price relating to supply to a port outside India. Rule 8 of the Customs Valuation (Determination of Price of Imported Goods) Rules, 1988 prohibits adoption of a price meant for export to a country other than India for customs valuation. No reason was shown for rejecting the transaction value.
Conclusion: The rejection of the transaction value and the enhancement of assessable value were unsustainable, and the valuation orders were set aside in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: For customs valuation, a price meant for export to a destination outside India cannot be adopted under Rule 8, and in the absence of valid reasons to reject the declared transaction value, that value must be accepted.