Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the demand for recovery could be reopened and the requirement of pre-deposit waived on the ground that the dispute was already covered by an earlier Tribunal order, attracting the principle of res judicata.
Analysis: The Tribunal noted that the same matter had earlier been adjudicated by its final order and that, in terms of that order, the assessee had taken credit and reversed it. On that basis, it formed a prima facie view that reopening the matter and insisting on recovery was not sustainable. The Tribunal therefore treated the earlier adjudication as sufficient to support interim protection pending disposal of the appeal.
Conclusion: The issue was answered in favour of the assessee. The Tribunal granted waiver of pre-deposit and stayed recovery till disposal of the appeal.