Security deposit cannot be forfeited on mere suspension of a Customs House Agent licence; early hearing justified.

A Customs House Agent licence under suspension for a substantial period justified early final hearing of the appeal. The order also stated that forfeiture of security deposit is not meant to accompany mere suspension of a CHA licence, because forfeiture is linked to revocation rather than suspension. On that basis, the adverse direction concerning the security deposit was treated as unsustainable, and the appeal was ordered to be listed for final hearing at an early date.

---

---

Issues: Whether the appeal deserved out-of-turn final hearing, and whether forfeiture of security deposit could accompany suspension of a Customs House Agent licence.

Analysis: The order notes that the licence had already remained under suspension for a substantial period and that early disposal of the appeal was warranted. It also records that security deposit cannot be forfeited along with suspension of a Customs House Agent licence, as forfeiture is stated to accompany revocation of the licence and not suspension.

Outcome: The appeal was directed to be listed for final hearing on an early date, and the order adverse to the security deposit was viewed as unsustainable.

---