CESTAT Chennai dismisses appeal for late filing without condonation, citing lack of knowledge on excise procedures. The appeal before CESTAT, Chennai was dismissed due to a 29-day delay in filing, which was not condoned. Lack of knowledge about filing procedures in ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
CESTAT Chennai dismisses appeal for late filing without condonation, citing lack of knowledge on excise procedures.
The appeal before CESTAT, Chennai was dismissed due to a 29-day delay in filing, which was not condoned. Lack of knowledge about filing procedures in Central Excise matters was not considered a valid excuse. The appeal and application were both dismissed.
The appeal before Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai was dismissed due to a delay of 29 days in filing the appeal, which was not condoned as the reason provided was not considered reasonable. The appellants' lack of knowledge about the law and procedure for filing appeals in Central Excise matters was not accepted as a valid explanation for the delay. The appeal and remaining application were both dismissed.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.