Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether clearances of goods bearing the brand name of another person, though ineligible for exemption under the notification, were liable to be excluded while computing the aggregate value of clearances for the previous financial year for determining eligibility to the small-scale exemption.
Analysis: Para 3 of the notification governed exclusion of clearances for the financial year commencing on 1-4-2003 for purposes of the slab-based duty table, whereas para 3A governed exclusion of clearances for the previous financial year for computing aggregate value. Clause (b) of para 3A specifically excluded clearances bearing the brand name or trade name of another person, where such clearances were ineligible for exemption under para 4. The branded goods in question were admitted to be ineligible for exemption under para 4, and therefore their clearances for the previous year were not to be included in the aggregate turnover computation.
Conclusion: The assessee made out a prima facie case that the previous year's clearances of the branded goods were excludible from the aggregate value, with the result that eligibility for the exemption in the subsequent year was established at the interim stage, and pre-deposit was waived with stay of recovery.