Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether pre-deposit of the duty demanded was required to be made pending appeal in a classification dispute concerning composite containers and plain paper drums, in view of conflicting Tribunal decisions.
Analysis: The duty demand arose from classification of the disputed goods under CETA Sub-heading 4819.12. The record noted conflicting Tribunal decisions in the assessee's own cases on the classification of composite containers and printed composite containers, and the authorities below had also treated paper drums as akin to printed carton boxes and cases. In view of this conflict, the case was considered fit for reference to a Larger Bench.
Outcome: Pre-deposit of duty was waived and recovery was stayed pending the appeal, and the papers were directed to be placed before the President for reference to a Larger Bench.