Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to exemption from duty under Notification No. 53/97-Cus. despite not producing the certificate issued by the jurisdictional Assistant Commissioner contemplated by the prescribed procedure for clearance to a 100% EOU.
Analysis: The goods were imported for use in a 100% EOU and were cleared on payment of duty. The prescribed procedure relied upon required a certificate from the jurisdictional Assistant Commissioner before duty-free clearance could be allowed. The record did not show production of such certificate. In the absence of that mandatory procedural requirement, the benefit of the exemption notification could not be availed.
Conclusion: The appellant was not entitled to the exemption and the claim failed.
Final Conclusion: The duty demand/refund dispute was resolved against the appellant, and the appeal was dismissed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where an exemption notification is available only upon compliance with a prescribed procedure requiring a jurisdictional certificate, the exemption cannot be claimed if that condition is not fulfilled.