Appellate Tribunal rules on penalty discretion, waives pre-deposit The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi considered whether penalties are mandatory or discretionary. The Tribunal found a legal issue requiring ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Appellate Tribunal rules on penalty discretion, waives pre-deposit
The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi considered whether penalties are mandatory or discretionary. The Tribunal found a legal issue requiring examination and waived the pre-deposit of the penalty, staying its recovery pending appeal disposal. The order was issued on 3-3-2006.
The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi heard a case where the penalty amount was enhanced by the Commissioner (Appeals) on the basis that it was mandatory. The appellant argued that penalties are discretionary, not mandatory. The Tribunal found a legal issue needing consideration and waived the pre-deposit of the penalty, staying its recovery until the appeal's disposal. The order was dictated and pronounced on 3-3-2006.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.