Valuation and exemption dispute: prima facie inapplicability of classification rulings led to only partial pre-deposit waiver.

In a valuation dispute linked to exemption under Notification No. 6/2002-C.E., the Tribunal noted that the controversy was not one of classification but of whether the value of the chassis could be excluded for exemption purposes. The running gear was found prima facie not to be a chassis under Heading 87.06, and authorities cited by the appellants were treated as inapplicable because they concerned classification rather than valuation and notification eligibility. On that basis, a strong prima facie case for complete waiver of pre-deposit was not made out, and only partial waiver was granted with the balance stayed pending appeal.

---

---

Issues: Whether the appellants made out a strong prima facie case for total waiver of pre-deposit in a dispute concerning valuation and the claim to exemption under Notification No. 6/2002-C.E. dated 1-3-2002.

Analysis: The dispute was not one of classification. The claimed exemption required exclusion of the value of the chassis falling under Heading 87.06, but the running gear was found prima facie not to be chassis under that heading. The authorities relied on by the appellants were held to be prima facie inapplicable because they concerned classification, whereas the present controversy concerned valuation and eligibility to the notification benefit. On that basis, a case for complete waiver of pre-deposit was not made out.

Conclusion: The request for total waiver was rejected, but partial waiver was granted on condition of deposit of a specified amount, with the balance stayed pending appeal.

---