Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported goods were eligible for exemption under Notification No. 23/96-Cus. dated 02-06-1998 as goods covered by the expression "Digital Imaging System for face X-ray".
Analysis: The lower appellate authority had held that the goods were covered by the notification description because they were made for dental radiography. On the facts found, the order under challenge did not disclose any reason warranting interference.
Conclusion: The exemption under the notification was upheld and the departmental appeal was rejected.