Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the ladle car was correctly classified under sub-heading 8454.00 of the Central Excise Tariff Act or under sub-heading 8609.00 of the Central Excise Tariff Act.
Analysis: The dispute turned on the proper tariff classification of the item. The Tribunal accepted the view that the goods were specifically covered by sub-heading 8454.00, and noted that this classification was supported by the HSN Explanatory Notes relating to that sub-heading. No illegality was found in the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) adopting that classification.
Conclusion: The classification under sub-heading 8454.00 was upheld and the Revenue's contention for classification under sub-heading 8609.00 was rejected.