Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant had made out a case for waiver of the balance pre-deposit in respect of the duty demand, and whether a bill of entry not bearing the signatures of a competent Customs Authority could be treated as a valid document for the purpose of Modvat credit.
Analysis: The demand arose from disallowance of Modvat credit taken on a bill of entry lacking the signatures of any competent Customs Authority. The order records a prima facie view that such a document could not be treated as valid at that stage, and therefore no illegality in the impugned order was made out for purposes of interim relief. In these circumstances, conditional waiver of the balance pre-deposit was granted on deposit of a specified amount, with recovery stayed pending disposal of the appeal.
Conclusion: The appellant was directed to make a partial pre-deposit, the balance pre-deposit was waived on that condition, and recovery was stayed; non-compliance would attract dismissal under Section 35-F of the Central Excise Act, 1944.