Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether refund of credit reversed on inputs used for export was admissible when the assessee had not availed the benefit of Notification No. 203/92-Cus. and had surrendered the value based advance licences, which were cancelled as unutilized.
Analysis: The assessee had fulfilled the export obligation but had not imported any goods against the advance licences. The licences were surrendered and cancelled, showing that the benefit of the notification was never availed. In such circumstances, reversal of credit was not required. The Trade Notice also supported refund where credit reversal was not legally necessary. The reasoning followed the earlier ruling relied upon in the order.
Conclusion: The refund claim was admissible and the appeal succeeded.