Rectification of advance rulings is limited to obvious errors and cannot reopen a reasoned conclusion on exemption scope.

Rule 18 allows rectification only of a mistake apparent from the record, applying the same standard as section 154 of the Income-tax Act. A point that can be reached only through debate, reasoning, or reconsideration of the merits is outside the rule. The challenged observation was treated as a considered conclusion on the scope of the exemption notification, not an obvious error, so rectification was unavailable. The AAR also stated that section 28J of the Customs Act binds an advance ruling only on the applicant, the specified matters under section 28H(2), and the Commissioner of Customs; purchasers of the applicant are not within that binding effect.

---

---

Issues: Whether the ruling disclosed any mistake apparent from the record so as to justify rectification under Rule 18 of the Advance Rulings (Procedural) Rules, 2003.

Analysis: Rule 18 permits amendment only to rectify a mistake apparent from the record, and the standard is the same in substance as rectification under Section 154 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. A mistake that can be discovered only by debate or a long process of reasoning is outside the rule. The impugned observation was held to be a considered conclusion on the scope of the exemption notification and not an accidental or obvious error. The Authority also held that Section 28J of the Customs Act, 1962 makes an advance ruling binding only on the applicant, the specified matters under Section 28H(2), and the Commissioner of Customs, so purchasers of the applicant were not covered by the binding effect of the ruling.

Conclusion: No mistake apparent from the record was shown, and rectification under Rule 18 was not available.

Final Conclusion: The rectification petition failed, and the earlier ruling remained undisturbed.

Ratio Decidendi: Rectification is permissible only for an obvious mistake apparent from the record, not for reopening a reasoned conclusion or a disputed issue requiring argument or inference.

---