Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the restriction limiting import of second-hand capital goods to machinery upto 10 years old applied to imports made under the Export Promotion Capital Goods Scheme during the relevant period.
Analysis: The EXIM Policy maintained separate treatment for general imports and imports under the Export Promotion Capital Goods Scheme. During the relevant period, Chapter 5 governing EPCG imports did not contain any age restriction for the imported machinery. The age condition was introduced only with effect from 1-3-2003, and the subsequent amendment could not govern imports made earlier. Since the importer had obtained the licence from the DGFT and no objection had been raised by that authority regarding the age of the machine, the Customs authorities were not justified in denying the concessional EPCG benefit on the basis of a condition not applicable at the time of import.
Conclusion: The age restriction did not apply to the EPCG import in question, and the denial of concessional duty was unsustainable.
Final Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the importer was granted the consequential relief flowing from acceptance of the EPCG claim.
Ratio Decidendi: An amendment introducing an import-condition under the EPCG Scheme operates prospectively and cannot be used to deny benefits for imports made before its commencement where the governing policy then contained no such restriction.