TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Appellate Tribunal clarifies Rule 173H(2)(e) on manufacturing; penalty enhancement request denied. Stay rejected, hearing set.</h1> The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi clarified that Rule 173H(2)(e) applies to cases involving remaking or repair amounting to manufacture. No stay ... Stay of order The judgment by Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi in Appeal No. E/3726/04 clarified that Rule 173H(2)(e) applies to cases involving remaking or repair amounting to manufacture. No stay granted. In Appeal No. E/3607/04, the Revenue's request for penalty enhancement was denied. Stay applications rejected, appeals scheduled for hearing on 10th February 2005.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
