Modvat credit on endorsed dealer invoices rejected where prescribed document rules were not satisfied.

Modvat credit was held inadmissible where invoices were issued by the manufacturer to a dealer and later endorsed in favour of the respondent, because they did not satisfy the prescribed document requirements under Rule 57G and could not form a valid basis for credit. The dealer was not the respondent's manufacturing unit, so the invoices could not be treated as proper eligibility documents. Circulars relied upon for imported inputs and bills of entry in the name of a head office were held inapplicable to these facts, making the appellate allowance of credit unsustainable.

---

---

Issues: Whether Modvat credit was admissible on invoices not issued in the respondent's name but endorsed by a dealer, and whether the Board circulars supported allowance of such credit.

Analysis: The credit was taken on invoices issued by the manufacturer to a dealer and thereafter endorsed in favour of the respondent. Such invoices did not conform to the prescribed documents under Rule 57G and could not be treated as valid basis for credit. The dealer was not a manufacturing unit of the respondent, and the circulars relied upon related to movement of imported inputs and procedure where inputs were received under a bill of entry in the name of the head office. Those circulars did not govern the present factual situation and were misapplied by the first appellate authority.

Conclusion: Modvat credit was not admissible, and the allowance of credit by the Commissioner (Appeals) was unsustainable.

---