Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery of duty and penalty in view of the denial of exemption under Notification No. 21/2002-Cus. for imported raw materials drawn for quality control testing.
Analysis: The application concerned imported inputs taken out only for quality control testing and kept separately, as required under the relevant Drugs & Cosmetics Rules, 1945, and not used in the manufacture of the final product. On that basis, a strong prima facie case was found for grant of interim relief notwithstanding the denial of the notification benefit by the lower authorities.
Conclusion: The requirement of pre-deposit of duty and penalty was waived and recovery was stayed pending appeal, in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Where imported inputs are shown prima facie to have been used only for quality control purposes and kept separately in compliance with the applicable regulatory requirements, interim waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery may be granted pending adjudication of the appeal.